Hi, > I updated these two packages to build against Boost library version > 1.35.0. It required a patch for the library, a lot of work to merge and > integrate upstream svn changes. These are packages descriptions, for > completeness. I wonder what we should do with ASIO. You are essentially patching the source to use the ASIO version inside Boost. There is also a standalone ASIO library (which uses "asio" instead of "boost::asio"), so would work without the patch, but I'm not sure we should really have all that code duplication (upstream maintains both variants and keeps them synchronized). Opinions? Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature