On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 14:12 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > It works fine in all the browsers I tested, including lynx. There isn't > > anything wrong with the page itself. > > In fact, the sponsor part was hidden by AdBlock Plus plugin because, I > suppose, of its id. In which case, IMHO, AdBlock+ is broken. Such over-generalisations give filtering a bad name. I am a sponsor in Debian, I provide advice as a sponsor, just because someone in AdBlock+ has made the daft leap from sponsor to advertiser does not mean I'm going to change my page to suit their warped dictionary. AdBlock in epiphany doesn't do this, iceweasel appears fine too (and still blocks all the ads I need to block without blocking genuine content). Thanks for identifying the cause of the problem though. Just be aware that sometimes "lack of content" may not be because of a broken web page, it is always worth checking with a sane browser like lynx (you also don't get the ads with lynx - at least not the image ones which are usually the most annoying anyway. I don't think many people try to block text ads like those from Google). -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part