Re: RFS: fpm2 - a password manager
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Laager wrote:
> In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why
> not just do a new fpm package (version 2.x.y) and avoid all the
> transitioning? To me, an fpm2 package makes sense only if you intend to
> support both versions in the archive at the same time.
FPM2 is a forked project from fpm.
I think we should respect the upstream name, both for FPM2 and fpm.
I do not think upstream author will be happy about the renaming.
We can drop the transitional package in Lenny+1.
Kind regards
Wen-Yen Chuang
- --
My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIJP/XdEpXpumNYVkRAhuCAKCC0zuq5WINKIRkuZxHKnDnuM4wsgCfd5Jr
tq8bB1glmZdv0ox8bvHUTkk=
=HIPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: