[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)



Hi David,
* David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> [2008-02-12 15:10]:
> Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100
> Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> ha scritto:
> > * David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> [2008-02-12 14:50]:
> > [...] 
> > > I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I
> > > cannot do that, as the GPG header is "confusing" the server.
> > > 
> > > So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it
> > > possible to send GPG-signed mails to control@b.d.o?
> > 
> > What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails 
> > no matter if they go to the control address or not and never 
> > had any problem with that.
> 
> To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something
> like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a
> "test mail" (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG
> signature as "PGP/MIME", before I was sending it as "PGP/Inline". I bet that
> control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages.

Yes this seems to be the reason then :)
Cheers
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html

Attachment: pgp0afng0Yj2w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: