[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)

Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100
Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> ha scritto:

> Hi David,

Hi Nico,

> * David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> [2008-02-12 14:50]:
> [...] 
> > I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I
> > cannot do that, as the GPG header is "confusing" the server.
> > 
> > So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is it
> > possible to send GPG-signed mails to control@b.d.o?
> What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails 
> no matter if they go to the control address or not and never 
> had any problem with that.

To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was something
like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a
"test mail" (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG
signature as "PGP/MIME", before I was sending it as "PGP/Inline". I bet that
control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages.


 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: