[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3


On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:12:02 +0100
Andreas Hoenen <andreas.hoenen@arcor.de> wrote:

> Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org> wrote:
> > Any reason why not to use /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make and including
> > dpatch rules direcly?
> Both ways are described as possible in the dpatch man page, but yours
> looks more elegant.  Adapted.

Where does clean1 target come from now? I don't see any reason for it.

> > I think it is cleaner not to have things like "if [ -f
> > debian/lintian.overrides ]" in debian/rules. You know whether there is
> > lintian override when you create package.
> My argumentation is as follows: For some releases I need overrides, for
> others not.  I prefer to change only one location (overrides file
> itself) than additionally the rules file.  But this seems to be
> arguable.  Thus changed.

It's better to fix reason why you need override than adding one on so,e

And one more note - watch file could be simplified to this and use
uscan support for sourceforge:

	Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: