Re: ITR: varkon (updated package)

[Matthias Julius <lists@julius-net.net>]

"Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org> writes:

> Better to run a test suite or otherwise cause an FTBFS on
> architectures where it is known to build broken or unusable binaries.
> Not being fully portable isn't an RC bug and will not block testing
> migration unless it is a regression and there is no good reason to
> block it from lenny if it only works on 32-bit arches.

OK.  This is another way.  I will have to think about it for a while
to come up with a good way to do that.

Are there any opinions against this approach?

Matthias