Re: ITR: varkon (updated package)
Erik Schanze <schanzi_@gmx.de> writes:
> IMO excluding of architectures is good if the program makes no sense on
> it, e.g. because of missing hardware.
>
> In your case it is a problem of unportable code, you should fix it
> before.
Yes, generally I agree with you. But properly fixing the code
certainly will take some time and I would like to get the package into
sid before that, so people can start playing with it.
I could file an RC bug myself to prevent it from migrating into
testing and to let people know that it is going to be flaky on 64bit
archs.
Matthias
Reply to: