On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:25:18 +0000 David Newgas <david@newgas.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:14 +0000, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:46:11 +0000 > > David Newgas <david@newgas.net> wrote: > > > > Umm, I meant programming language: C, C++, Python, Perl, etc. > > Hehe. The program itself is Perl, but it has plugins written from C, > perl and python. OK, thanks. > > > Wicrawl is a simple wi-fi (802.11x) Access Point auditor with a simple > > > and flexible plugin architecture. The plugins allow us to find out > > > useful information about an AP so we don’t have to manually check each > > > access point. > > > > OK, so what is the advantage over existing methods of doing this, like > > wifi-radar and simple iwconfig commands? > > > > Perhaps the description needs expanding ... the plugins handle things > like wep cracking, wpa bruteforcing, bypassing of payment-required > access points... > It's not designed to handle connecting to networks, more is a user > friendly way to test their security. Sounds like it would be good to expand on the 'auditor' element in the short description to include the role of testing security. > That would be fantastic. Only one portion of it (the "apwebcrack" > plugin) is written in python, so I don't know if you still feel like it. Yes, I'm happy with that. I'll post a more detailed review tonight. > > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lang > > Having read through the rest of this doc, I also noticed I missed the > Homepage: field. I changed this, and others things (all documented in > changelog) As per your suggested course of action, I uploading it to > mentors as 0.4a-2. Thanks. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpmR6hvJN65x.pgp
Description: PGP signature