On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
> necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
Uh? Is "rollback" (in the sense of "undoing" a commit) possible with SVN
without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
If this is *not* the case and you're meaning committing a patch undoing
a past change, then the new commit will get a greater revision number.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature