On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:39:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Why bother with the date? 2.1~svn-r91 seems much more concise and > has the same information, really. Though you're right that the information is the same, a date is meaningful in spite of the knowledge of the revision control system (subversion in this case). The same can't be said for the SVN revision number. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature