Re: RFC: irrlicht
Sorry for the late response.
On 17/08/07, Andres Mejia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 8/17/07, Raphael Geissert <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Yesterday night I uploaded to mentors a new version of the package.
> > Changes:
> > * debhelper files are now generated from templates so the package
> > version information (except debian/control) is updated automatically
> > by debian/rules.
> > * Added -dbg package
> > * Added -D_REENTRANT
> > * $(version) and $(major) are manually set now (but there's a check
> > that makes sure that include/IrrCompileConfig.h says the same as those
> > two vars)
> > * Fixed build-depends
> > * merged the two binary-arch- build targets
> > * moved headers to include/Irrlicht1.3.1 (with symlink at include/Irrlicht)
> > TO CHECK (comments on this please):
> > * irrlicht seems not to be compiled with zlib/libpng/libjpeg support
> > * -fPIC is only used when building the .so file but not when compiling
> > the source files (is it ok this way?)
> > * whether to use the .pc file or not (personally I see no advantage,
> > what do you think Brandon?)
> > * Should the .chm file be shipped in the -doc package or only the HTML
> > documentation?
> > * what to do with the media/ files in the -examples package (some
> > files are not free like dx's logo, opengl logo; there's also the
> > lucida font in a .png file so I'm not sure it is ok)
> > * lintian complaining about missing soname
> I still see only version 1.3.1-1 of irrlicht, or did you mean to leave
> it as that? It would make more sense to change it to 1.3.1-2.
I did leave it as -1
> Andres Mejia
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
Say NO to Microsoft Office broken standard.