[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: irrlicht

On 8/17/07, Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yesterday night I uploaded to mentors a new version of the package.
> Changes:
> * debhelper files are now generated from templates so the package
> version information (except debian/control) is updated automatically
> by debian/rules.
> * Added -dbg package
> * Added -D_REENTRANT
> * $(version) and $(major) are manually set now (but there's a check
> that makes sure that include/IrrCompileConfig.h says the same as those
> two vars)
> * Fixed build-depends
> * merged the two binary-arch- build targets
> * moved headers to include/Irrlicht1.3.1 (with symlink at include/Irrlicht)
> TO CHECK (comments on this please):
> * irrlicht seems not to be compiled with zlib/libpng/libjpeg support
> * -fPIC is only used when building the .so file but not when compiling
> the source files (is it ok this way?)
> * whether to use the .pc file or not (personally I see no advantage,
> what do you think Brandon?)
> * Should the .chm file be shipped in the -doc package or only the HTML
> documentation?
> * what to do with the media/ files in the -examples package (some
> files are not free like dx's logo, opengl logo; there's also the
> lucida font in a .png file so I'm not sure it is ok)
> * lintian complaining about missing soname

I still see only version 1.3.1-1 of irrlicht, or did you mean to leave
it as that? It would make more sense to change it to 1.3.1-2.

Andres Mejia

Reply to: