[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: logapp

Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> (16/08/2007):
> So, if we're going to recommend a notation, I'd argue for the standard
> one.

I guess you didn't check the status of the RFC you quoted. From [1]
you would have learnt that RFC 1738 is obsoleted by RFC 3986[2], which

| Using <> angle brackets around each URI is especially recommended as
| a delimiting style for a reference that contains embedded whitespace.
| The prefix "URL:" (with or without a trailing space) was formerly
| recommended as a way to help distinguish a URI from other bracketed
| designators, though it is not commonly used in practice and is no
| longer recommended.

 1. http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc1700.htm
 2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3886
	(Appendix C.  Delimiting a URI in Context)

Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpaMOl0Jshn4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: