Re: btrfs packages: reviews appreciated
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Ok. Not sure if the package should be part of l-m-e, though.
fair enough; however, if i were you, i would go for the 'common' scheme
right from the beginning, rather than going to through NEW (and maybe
even add transitional packages) once it's ready. apart from that, it's
just saner to have most module packages behave the same anyway.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Reply to: