[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ibpp



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Damyan Ivanov ha scritto:
> Hi, David,

Hi Damyan, thanks for your reply.

> As I understand it, the IBPP files are simply copied
> in /usr/include/ibpp. While this is not bad by itself, I wonder, what
> is the purpose of the package?
> 
> Don't get me wrong, I am not against the package, it would be just
> interesting to hear the reasons why you need it.

Well, I've found a reference to "libibpp" when trying to repackage gambas2 (in
particular, the gb.db.firebird component, which provides firebird accessibility
to gambas projects).
So I've just decided to make this package: I think it's simpler having common
files in separate packages (I don't agree with Olivier's statement below).

> When packaging flamerobin, I talked to Olivier (IBPP lead developer)
> and his preference was not to make IBPP a separate *library* package,
> but simply continue to include it in the applications' source (as
> flamerobin does). Your package is not a library one, but still, did you
> talk to upstream stating your intention to package IBPP?

Well, not, I didn't talk to Olivier (or anybody else). I didn't think it was
necessary.

>> It seems to me that the IBPP License is a free software license.
>> It can be read at <http://www.ibpp.org/license>. Should I contact
>> debian-legal?
> 
> Flamerobin[1] includes IBPP in its sources and it passed
> d-legal and ftp-master approval.

I supposed that ;-)

> dam

Regards,
David

- --
 . ''`.  Debian packager! | http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/
 : :'  :   User #334216   |  http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`   GPG: 1392B174   | http://www.debianizzati.org/
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGRc1q5qqQFxOSsXQRAggjAJwNrNOfQuExkc30Z09vOrEWyA0L9QCfaHhQ
UYIo6T0nstvE83Ji0FHV38s=
=RE3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: