[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: debian-sec



Hi Tim,

> It builds these binary packages:
> debian-sec - debian-sec packages
> security-client - debian-sec protocol specific client packages
> security-develop - debian-sec tool and exploit development packages
> security-emulate - debian-sec host emulation packages
> security-encrypt - debian-sec data encryption packages
> security-enumerate - debian-sec host enumeration packages
> security-fuzz - debian-sec protocol fuzzing packages
> security-host - debian-sec local host packages
> security-misc - debian-sec miscellaneous packages
> security-server - debian-sec protocol specific server packages
> security-sniff - debian-sec traffic sniffing packages
> security-tunnel - debian-sec traffic tunneling packages
> security-wardrive - debian-sec bluetooth and wifi wardriving packages

This resembles much of what is already known as a "Custom Debian
Distribution": a Debian-subproject that aims to make Debian better
suitable for a specific application (Children, Medicine, or in this case
Security Research) from within Debian itself.

What such a CDD does is in short:
- Bring people together that are interested in this subject;
- Work together on packages for this subject and work to get
  relevant new packages introduced;
- Create a way to easily install collections of those packages,
  e.g. as per the meta packages above, and/or debtags and/or
  a customized installer, etc.

Here's more background on the subject:
http://people.debian.org/~tille/cdd/
http://wiki.debian.org/CustomDebian

I would really suggest that you try to create some kind of (potential)
group to maintain e.g. the packages above, for example with an Alioth
Project, a mailinglist and some announcement about it. Even if you're
the only one at first, that makes it easier for other people to join in.

If you need more help, there's also a debian-custom mailinglist and
channel.

Good luck!

Thijs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: