Better to run multiple configure/make cycles or use separate sources?
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Better to run multiple configure/make cycles or use separate sources?
- From: Roman Müllenschläder <info@prodeia.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:53:44 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200702191753.44687.info@prodeia.de>
- In-reply-to: <200701181857.20193.info@prodeia.de>
- References: <200701110927.27878.info@prodeia.de> <45AD6128.5050305@debian.org> <200701181857.20193.info@prodeia.de>
Hi List!
I'm packaging a program which offers different options in using different
compile options.
My wish is to provide different binary-packages in the end.
What should be done?
Should I prepare the 'rules' to do different compilations with
different 'configures' and separate the files with *.install files afterwards
or should I prepare separate sources each with it's own unique 'rules' doing
just one compile and building only one binary each?
If the first, where can I find appropriate How-Tos?
Lg
Roman
Reply to: