Re: RFS: weather-util - command-line tool to obtain weather conditions and forecasts
Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:35:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The reference to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is not really correct
>> since your software is not Copyright The Regents of the University of
>> California. I'd remove that and just put the full text of the license
>> into debian/copyright. Besides, your license doesn't actually match
>> anyway; you only have a two-clause license.
> Great point, and corrected (uploaded to the same repo). I didn't bump
> the package revision since I've seen some debates in here on whether
> it's a good idea to enter the new queue with something other than a -1
> rev, but I can easily do so and update the debian/changelog if such is
> your preference.
Nah, I prefer it the way that you did it.
Looks good to me at this point. I've gone ahead and uploaded it. You
should shortly get the notification that it's waiting in NEW.
> As per the FAQ, the default list is far from complete and submissions
> are welcomed.
Whoops, sorry, I should have RTFMed. That explains the whole situation
nicely. Thank you!
> The couple hundred I threw in there were ones where I was easily able to
> match the METAR up to a forecast path with an identical state and
> city/MSA name (via some quick and dirty awk magic). It's trivial to add
> your own aliases or even just use the command-line switches instead.
Does using the command line switch work when there isn't an entry in the
database? I wasn't having any luck with just weather --id=KPAO, but I may
have been missing something. And indeed, it seems to be working now.
Must have just been pilot error.
> Thanks for the interest and let me know if any other issues jump out
> at you!
Thank you for writing it! This is something I'll probably use regularly.
It's nice and simple and useful and doesn't require subjecting myself to
piles of advertising on the web.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: