[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFS]: jsMath:TeX equations in HTML documents

On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> 2. only iff conf.d is not included (may be older config files were
> preserved during upgrades or explicitely removed by sysadmin), then it
> adds that explicit rule.

I haven't really been following this, so I'm not sure if you're
targeting Apache 1 or Apache 2, but if you're targetting Apache 2, is it
possible that this code has always been there? If that's the case, the
only reason it wouldn't be there is if the sysadmin removed it, in which
case it seems wrong for you to blindly assume that you can add code to
their conffile.

In any case, I thought it violated Debian Policy to modify a conffile
from another package, so you shouldn't do this either way, right?

I'm not a DD. I'm a new packager, so please don't rely on what I've just
said. However, I'd love to have clarification on this, to improve my own


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: