On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > > > If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in > > > > debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one > > > > you should find out what it is and add it, or drop the file. > hi, > yesterday I have written to the author of the patch, this morning I have > received an answer... > in short, the author (Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>) > says that: > (quoting his words) "You may use, modify, redistribute with or without modifications in any > way you wish." > > and that it's not necessary to put information about the copyright of > the patch in debian/copyright... So, probably the right thing is to put the copyright information and quote the author's mail in there. -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature