Re: RFS: inotail -- inotify enhanced tail (updated package)
On 2006-09-24 at 17:19:13 +0200, James Westby <email@example.com> wrote:
> On (24/09/06 12:00), Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > On 2006-09-22 at 20:56:02 +0200, Tobias Klauser <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inotail".
> > >
> > > * Package name : inotail
> I cannot sponsor either I am afraid, but I have a couple more small
> * You use a - prefix for $(MAKE) clean in debian/rules, but I don't
> think that is right. clean should always succeed if the Makefile is
> there (you rm -f everything), and if the Makefile isn't there then
> there is a serious problem, and you don't really want to mask it.
> This is used for autotools packages where it is possible the
> Makefile is not there, and that should be ignored.
Oh, sorry I didn't pay attention to this. It is fixed now.
> * You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
> debian/copyright. There is also no license information for this
> file, can you get it and add it?
This file was taken from the Linux Kernel source tree and slightly
altered (Dropped everything in #ifdef __KERNEL__ as not needed and
useful in userspace). So this is licensed under the GPL. Would it
suffice to add a notice about this to debian/copyright (plus the
copyright information for the same file)? Or might it be better to
depend on linux-kernel-headers and take the file from there
Thanks for your help,
.''`. Tobias Klauser - Debian enthusiast
: :' : <email@example.com>
`. `'` GPG-Key: 0x3A445520