Re: RFS: spcaview
Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Thursday 21 September 2006 03:00, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
>
>> Luca bedogni wrote:
>>
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spcaview".
>>>
>>> * Package name : spcaview
>>> Version : 1.1.5-1
>>> Upstream Author : Michel Xhaard
>>> * URL :http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spcaview
>>> * License : GPL
>>> Section : x11
>>>
>>> It builds these binary packages:
>>> spcaview - webcam viewer to use with the spca5xx driver
>>>
>>> The package is lintian clean.
>>>
>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spcaview
>>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>>> main contrib non-free
>>> - dget
>>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spcaview/spcaview_1.1.5-1.ds
>>> c
>>>
>>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Luca Bedogni
>>>
>> I have already packaged this software and upload them. They have been
>> remove from ftp-new because spca5xx team want me to work with them. But
>> they still don't have uploaded any spcaview package. Dunno why.
>>
>
> Huh?
>
> When I contacted you, I cannot recall your intention to withdraw the package.
> I assumed you just went ahead with it . . .
>
> If there is a package ready, please find a sponsor now. If someone would like
> to use the existing pkg-spca5xx facilities on alioth that can be arranged
> too, just let me know. There is already a packaging effort existing in
> pkg-spca5xx SVN on svn.debian.org
>
They have packaging stuff but I do not rembember if it was ready.
I made a working package, wich patched Makefile and all missing manpages.
I'll try to get my package.
> Otavio did not seem interested (no reply iirc) last time spcaview was
> requested for upload, but maybe someone else would like to.
>
It was the same for me but when the package were in new queue he
contacted me to stop the upload.
Strange.
> Thanks, Kel.
>
Np. Maybe we could work both together ?
Reply to: