Re: RFH: python-support and arch dependant file

["Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <gandalf@le-vert.net>]

James Westby wrote:
> [Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps
> mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond]
>
> On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote:
>   
>> After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do
>> this. 
>>
>>     
>
> Ok, in #361400 you say you are not happy with the "included patch",
> which patch do you mean by this? 
>
> You then said on IRC that you had found a better solution, but the
> current version on mentors appears to have my first patch used.
>   
The patch is still present bu not used anymore. I call scons with
several python version, just have a look to the new debian/rules ;-)
> If you are after a different solution could you please explain what you
> are trying to achieve, and where my patches fall short. 
>   
less debian/rules again !
> James
>   
Thanks for your help.