Re: RFS: urw-garamond -- scalable PostScript font from the Garamond family
Rogério Brito <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I just read the copyright file and I thought that it would be
> distributable. Are there any conflicts in what is written there?
I pointed out the problems I saw in the initial thread about this RFS.
Please check the debian-mentors archives.
> Please educate me regarding this. Wouldn't it be distributable even in
Not in non-free, not on mentors.debian.net, nowhere. Basically, IIRC,
the license requires prominent notice in every file when changes are
made to the fonts stating at least the date and author of the
changes. This clause of the license was not respected in the last
package I reviewed. This must be fixed upstream. Upstream is alive,
Debian-aware and friendly (hi, Ralf!), so this should be doable.
 Well, the license was not developed with fonts in mind, as it
 Walter Schmidt's cooperation is also probably needed for a new
release, but I don't think it's a problem either.