Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared
El Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:56:00 +0300
George Danchev <email@example.com> escribió:
> On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > > >
> > > > ^^^^^^^
> > > >
> > > > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
> > >
> > > True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda
> > > warn if changelog claims Non-maintainer upload and the
> > > debian-revision value is not compliant with the conventions
> > They do. However, since you added yourself as comaintainer (via
> > Uploaders:), they didn't actually consider it an NMU.
> That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a
> maintaner makes no sense.
It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another
non-DD and the package maintainer sponsors it.
"You will have a long and unpleasant discussion with your supervisor."