[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> >          ^^^^^^^
> >
> > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
> True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda warn if 
> changelog claims Non-maintainer upload and the debian-revision value is not 
> compliant with the conventions

They do.  However, since you added yourself as comaintainer (via Uploaders:),
they didn't actually consider it an NMU.  They could check that non-NMU
uploads must not say "Non maintainer upload" in the changelog.  Appearantly
they don't do that.  I think a wishlist bug is in order there.


I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: