Re: RFS: gtkradiant
On Friday 30 June 2006 13:27, you wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 21:50, Frits Daalmans wrote:
> --cut--
>
> > Thank you for your time!
>
> Welcome ;-)
>
> > Lintian is now happy and I've done an upload to version 1.5.0-3
> > to mentors.debian.net
>
> Well, yet another one for fun, I missed to spot at the first place:
>
> linda -i ../gtkradiant_1.5.0-3_i386.deb
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/archivepak.so
> is considered architecture-dependent.
> The file shown above is reported by file to be an ELF binary, and is
> installed under the /usr/share directory, which is reserved for
> architecture-independent files.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/archivewad.so
> is considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/archivezip.so
> is considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/entity.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/image.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/imagehl.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/imagepng.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/imageq2.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/mapq3.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/mapxml.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/md3model.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/model.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/shaders.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/modules/vfspk3.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/plugins/bobtoolz.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
> E: gtkradiant; The file /usr/share/games/gtkradiant/plugins/prtview.so is
> considered architecture-dependent.
>
>
> I do believe linda is right ;-) You should install these in /usr/lib,
> i.e.: /usr/lib/gtkradiant/modules/
>
> --cut--
>
> > "it never does that when I compile it" :-) (really!)
> > corrected with your dpatch. I compiled it with
> > $ g++ --version
> > g++ (GCC) 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3)
>
> You must always built against the target you upload to <as explained by
> Alec in another mail/>
Hello George,
thanks for the feedback. I put the modules and plugins in
/usr/lib/games/gtkradiant/ now. (version 1.5.0-4)
I also tried to do a bit of code-cleanup (dpatch nr.
50_minor_warnings.dpatch) but I didn't take a look at all those
signed-unsigned comparisons.
And I compile with g++-4.1.2; I think I understand why it is important
to build against the correct target; however unstable is always changing;
would it then be better to compile against etch?
ok, bye,
Frits
Reply to: