Hi! * Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [060213 13:08]: > On 2/13/06, Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl> wrote: > > A small problem with it though: When I put all architecture independant data > > in its own package, lintian starts complaining that the binary lacks a > > manpage. For the moment, I moved the manpage back in the arch:any package > > (it's small anyway), but that doesn't seem to be a good solution. Is an > > override in order for this? Or is there a better solution? > > I've been told that the manpage usually goes with the binary. Since > it's really small, I guess that it's not much of a problem There was a nice summary / discussion last november on -devel on how to do -data packages.... Thread starts here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01170.html Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature