[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: sdljump


* Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [060213 13:08]:
> On 2/13/06, Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl> wrote:
> > A small problem with it though: When I put all architecture independant data
> > in its own package, lintian starts complaining that the binary lacks a
> > manpage.  For the moment, I moved the manpage back in the arch:any package
> > (it's small anyway), but that doesn't seem to be a good solution.  Is an
> > override in order for this?  Or is there a better solution?
> I've been told that the manpage usually goes with the binary.  Since
> it's really small, I guess that it's not much of a problem

There was a nice summary / discussion last november on -devel on how to
do -data packages....

Thread starts here:

Yours sincerely,


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: