Hi, Op do 24 nov 2005 om 10:51:43 +0100 schreef Adriaan Peeters: > On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 10:41 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote: > > Op do 24 nov 2005 om 09:34:30 +0100 schreef Adriaan Peeters: > > > > > > For my ITP (#333680) I need a new version of libglademm [1,2]. > > > > Could you add a note why this is needed to Bug #333730? > > It is already there. Sorry for being unclear: Is it next to impossible to get sysinfo working with libglademm 2.4.1? Why? Would 2.5.1-1 as currently in experimental be OK? (If so, perhaps it's sane to upload your package to experimental while waiting for a final fix.) <snip> > I contacted > the maintainer, but no response yet. In the mean time my e-mail has been > forwarded to mia@qa.d.o so I guess they will handle it. Yes, they are looking at it, too. Bye, Joost
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature