Hi, Op do 24 nov 2005 om 09:34:30 +0100 schreef Adriaan Peeters: > > For my ITP (#333680) I need a new version of libglademm [1,2]. Could you add a note why this is needed to Bug #333730? > Unfortunately the current maintainer seems not very responsive, with > several of his bugs open for years [3]. We are all volunteers and I do > understand that he can be occupied, but as I am no DD, I cannot check > whether is on vacation or if there is more information on him being MIA. > > What is the right course of action? Several of his bugs are quite > trivial to fix, so maybe some help could speed things up considerably. Did you read "7.4. Dealing with inactive and/or unreachable maintainers" in the Debian Developer's Reference? Some ideas: You could sent patches for libglademm to the BTS. You could offer to become comaintainer of libglademm. You could suggest to the maintainer to post a RFH. Bye, Joost
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature