Re: Policy documentation on debconf
* Frank Küster (email@example.com) [051227 17:40]:
> Do you think it would be an obstacle for development if that were
> documented in the Policy, just as the same is documented for the
> "classical" maintainer scripts? Why isn't it an obstacle for those
> other scripts?
Well, I think any new script should be given some time to let it evolve
freely. However, the debconf now becomes more and more classical, so it
might be the right time to change the status.