[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC/RFS] adm8211-source - driver for ADMtek wifi card



On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 18:26 -0400, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:

> You're well-placed to know since you're the credited author :)  So
> agreed, my mistake.

Well, I just made a couple of minimal patches, Matthew Palmer is the
main author.

> Other comments ?

debian/changelog - add (Closes: #333237) - when someone sponsors the
upload, make sure they build the package with the "-v 0.0.20050620-1"
option to debuild/dpkg-buildpackage. That way all the changlog entries
will be included in the upload and your ITP bug will be closed.

In line with the developers reference, I recommend you change the last
two lines of debian/control to this:

 Homepage: http://aluminum.sourmilk.net/adm8211/

Standards-Version is only 3 numbers - 1.2.3.X releases are all
compatible - only minor changes like typos/etc.

Depends: hotplug - hmm, this is tricky, since hotplug is being replaced
by udev right now - check the debian-devel archives for more
details/flamewars.

debian/copyright: I would make some stylistic changes:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
Copyright:

Copyright 2003 Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>
Copyright 2004-2005 Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>

License:

This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.

This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
GNU General Public License for more details.

On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

debian/docs: INSTALL and NOTES-FC2 probably aren't relevant.

debian/README.Debian: I don't see any README file in the source package,
is it generated at build time or something?

"Please see ./README for a description of the adm8211 driver."

debian/README.Debian: AFAIK, module assistant does all the unpacking, no
need to put the cd/tar

debian/rules: Lots of sponsors like it if you remove commedted out dh_*
lines because it makes the rules file look cleaner and is more readable.

Trying to build the modules failed for me, I think you have to get
adm8211 registered in the module-assistant package:

# m-a a-i adm8211
adm8211, what is adm8211?

Personally, I think there needs to be /usr/share/modass/compliant.list.d
- you may want to file a wishlist bug about this against m-a (in
addition to one asking for adding adm8211-source
to /usr/share/modass/compliant.list)

Don't forget to check your package with lintian and linda:

> Now running lintian...
> W: adm8211-source: package-contains-upstream-install-documentation usr/share/doc/adm8211-source/INSTALL
> N:
> N:   Binary packages do not need to contain the instructions for building
> N:   and installing the package as this info is not needed by package
> N:   users. If the info contained is important for configuration perhaps it
> N:   could be summarized in README.Debian, otherwise an override may be
> N:   added.
> N:
> N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.3 for details.
> N:
> E: adm8211-source: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
> N:
> N:   The /usr/share/doc/<pkg>/copyright file refers to the old postal
> N:   address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The new address is:
> N:
> N:     Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston,
> N:     MA 02110-1301, USA.
> N:

Here is a useful ~/.devscripts file:
export DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS="-us -uc -i -ICVS -I.svn"
export DEBUILD_LINDA=yes
export DEBUILD_LINTIAN_OPTS=-i
export DEBUILD_LINDA_OPTS=-i

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: