On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 01:39 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote: > skaller wrote on 30/07/2005 19:08: > > On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 08:55 -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: > >>You can test this yourself to see that it works correctly. For example, > >>try to install "cfengine2" (Conflicts: cfengine) and then "cfengine". > > > > > > I'll take your word for it .. in this case, why is there > > a problem with the udev thing? > > I don't know of any problem with udev. Where from do you gather that > there is any problem with udev? I didn't .. > It was suggested to provide a way to say: I don't recommend to use X > with a version lower than y.z. Currently, you can _conflict_ with X > (<y.z), but you can't say "Recommends: !X (<y.z)" to recommend not using > X with a version lower than y.z. > Hmm, that explanation doesn't look too good, but I hope you still > understand it. I do now: I jumped to an incorrect conclusion from the discussion, and proceeded to analyse from that wrong position, thereby wasting a peoples time, for which I apologise: thanks for correcting me, and sorry! -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part