also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [2005.04.12.2222 +0200]: > It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian > directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and > test their software while developing it. Huh? Why not just use ./Makefile? > What does not make a lot of sense is to release the .tar.gz with > the ./debian directory, as Steve Halasz said, it's perfectly valid > to have it in CVS the important point would be to convince them > not to include it in the release. I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the Debian maintainer, not of the upstream. Unless you are developing software *for* *Debian* (native), there is no reason why you should bother with ./debian at all. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! military intelligence is a contradiction in terms. -- groucho marx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature