Re: #281307

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@m4x.org> writes:

> I'm the current flyspray maintainer ... and I should say I don't know 
> what to do with that bug [1]
>
>   Upstream, and I agree on the fact that the problem is not flyspray's 
> fault. Should I close the bug ? or let it live with wontfix for years ? 
> or should I reassign the problem to privoxy ?
>
>   I do not like long-living bugs ;)
>
>
>  [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281307
> -- 
> ·O·  Pierre Habouzit
> ··O
> OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

One problem I see here is that other projects can DOS flyspray. Create
a webpage and set a broken flyspray cookie in it.

It's ok for flyspray to complain about broken cookies but then it
could remove or overwrite them with sane values so users can continue.

MfG
        Goswin