Re: Packages that can provide essential services (but not always)

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages that *can* provide essential services (but not always)
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:53:02 +0100
Message-id: <87zmzi8mep.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <41E08574.30806@cowlark.com> (David Given's message of "Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:14:28 +0000")
References: <41E08574.30806@cowlark.com>

* David Given:

> Is there a correct way of tackling this kind of thing?

Does citadel provide the /usr/lib/sendmail interface?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages that *can* provide essential services (but not always)
  - From: David Given <dg@cowlark.com>

References:
- Packages that *can* provide essential services (but not always)
  - From: David Given <dg@cowlark.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Need Sponsor for Package and Myself
Next by Date: RFS: dosage -- powerful webcomic downloader / archiver
Previous by thread: Packages that *can* provide essential services (but not always)
Next by thread: Re: Packages that *can* provide essential services (but not always)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread