Frank Küster wrote:
Nick Lewycky <nicholas@mxc.ca> wrote:Is there any plan amongst dpkg type folk to visit and solve this problem? Or even a bug number?There are several, of different severities, as you could easily have found out yourself.
I found an 8 year old wishlist bug on dpkg-dev, bug 4588. I found a debian-mentors discussion from 1999 where someone claims that dpkg-dev should not need to represent binary changes, http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/1999/06/msg00003.html .
Am I looking in the wrong places? Are there any serious initiatives, with traction? Nick