On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such
> > situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive?
> Since you are the only one using I would say link it in
> static. Problem solved.
I made it this way. Seems to work fine.
> But on second thought, seeing that its utilitie_s_, static linking
> would waste ram.
I was wrong. I thought it will provide many small binaries, but seems
that it is linked in one binary with many features.
So there won't be wasting ram.
> But you are still the only one using that library and could combine
> the two sources into one package. If the soname changes all the time
> both need to be uploaded and recompiled in sync anyway. No point in
> making two debs.
Making one deb from these two upstream sources wasn't as simple as
I thought... nevermind. I've just made package with library.
This should first come to Debian's archive, and then I'll provide
packages that depends on it.
I have made this package. Now only checking it with pbuilder
to ensure it builds fine with it.
When this will be done, then I ask for sponsor here...
I hope that someone upload it for me ;)
Thanks once again for answers.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Feński | mailto:fenio@o2.pl | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Głowackiego 3/15 - w. małopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - najsłabsze ogniwo
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:fenio@jabber.org | RLU:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature