[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: UTF-8 in copyright files?

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
> > > when groff will support it properly (as in UTF-8 input; UTF-8 output is
> > > more or less OK now), since nobody's yet done the work and it's Hard. I
> > 
> > Yep, noticed that also, man simply removes the - from manpages, which is
> > a pain, as they get used pretty much in manpages.
> See /etc/groff/{man,mdoc}.local. (And no, groff doesn't remove "-", it

Ok, will look.

> renders it as the Unicode HYPHEN character.)

Well, i most definitively cannot see it, and i am using a UTF-8 aware
xterm (uxterm if i am not wrong).

> > > don't think we'd want either to delay sarge+1 by an arbitrary amount of
> > > time until that happens or to drop man pages from the distribution ...
> > 
> > Then, do not say that we should allow UTF-8 usage in files, if it is
> > clearly not going to be supported. Come one, sarge+1 is probably more
> > than 2 years away, if we cannot support UTF-8 by then, something is
> > seriously wrong.
> What I'm saying is that we depend on upstreams to make significant
> design changes, and that's something we have little control over, so it
> shouldn't be a release goal as such. Some changes can be made in Debian,
> but I'm not sure radical design shifts with compatibility implications
> qualify.

It would assuredly not be the first time that we fork upstream to fit
our goals and needs.


Sven Luther

Reply to: