Re: [OFFTOPIC] passwd-ng
In article <[🔎] 20030924130435.GN16087@khan.acc.umu.se> david@southpole.se writes:
>Don't you just look forward to the final release of my little project
>passwd-ng? (Google will find it for you, I'm sure...), which will bring
>a lot of sanity to Unix user and group management. Those who have
>ever tried the {ls,rm,ch,mk}{user,group}/chgrpmem commands available in
>AIX have tasted it already; I'm reimplementing these commands, suitably
>adapted to Linux. Maybe some day I'll actually get around to make a
>first release...
Hopefully you won't be reimplementing the bugs:
Date-time format: use something both human readable and sortable.
(mmddHHMMyy is neither, seconds since 1970 is at
least the latter. "yyyy-mm-dd HH:MM:SS" would be good.)
Consistant interface
(some of the commands use -a before attributes, other don't)
(see date format above)
reserved username
If ALL is used to indicate all users, how can I have a user
named ALL?
readable output
lsuser has a glop of output that it is difficult to find
anything in.
backend
/etc/passwd must stay.
things being updated by login should be in a database.
The additional administrator set things should be in another
editable file. I'm not fond of the paragraphs of glop format
of /etc/security/passwd.
wishlist:
inactive-expire (expire after x days with no login or other password
requiring activitiy.)
--
Blars Blarson blarson@blars.org
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
Reply to: