Re: [RFS]: digitaldj
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had
> > time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had
> > my key signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. Not
> > being a DD yet, I can't upload it myself, but I have prepared a
> > package for the newest digitaldj (0.7.3). You can find it at:
> > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/
> > I would really appreciate it if someone would take a look at it
> > and upload it if they think it's good enough.
> There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the package
> was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from the changelog
> and makes no mention of whether it fixes bug #192352 (which the NMU
> was made to address) or reintroduces this bug.
Well the new version of digitaldj has seen a lot of rewriting. Now it
does use the new mysql ABI correclty and doesn't have any multiline
constants, which is what the patch was about.
Hence this new version closes this bug also, so I guess I should just
use (Closes: #192352) here.
> You should always base a new package on the latest version in the
> Debian archive.
Hmm, but the whole point was that I (and maybe others) wanted/needed the
new version, which source-wise differs a lot with the one in the
I'll make a new version that fixes this, tonight (I'm at work now)...