[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU



On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> writes:
[NMU of cdrdao]
>> Whatever, I think the situation - the version of cdrdao in debian is
>> not non-free but illegal - justifies a NMU to DELAYED/9-day.
 
> I think it would even justify an immediate NMU. I will have a look at
> the package, but as it is new upstream and sensitive stuff, I will
> probably try ripping and burning CDs, too, so it might take some
> time. (However, weekend is near...)

Hello,
Thanks. I am not too comfortable with this NMU myself - I don't use
cdrdao very often - but the upload is really needed, and nobody else
seemed to care.

>> The packages are available on 
>> http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/cdrdao/
 
> I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file
> does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build,
> so it will take whatever default the user has. IMHO this is a bug, but
> people might disagree. I don't know if changing this in an NMU is
> neccessary but I would do it.

I just wanted to fix #161885 and take a shot at #116782 while making
only minimal changes, IMHO this is the right procedure for a 'hasty'
NMU.

If I had played with the thought of taking over cdrdao I would have
given the package a big overhaul (probably using debhelper), but I
just wanted to get this version uploaded without breaking anything.
            cu andreas

Attachment: pgp3QpBxZl4MV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: