Re: GPG Key Signing (Was: Advocate/Sponsor)
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone this concerned
| about security would realize that the same needed to be done for evey
| ID one needed to verify. Quite obviously I was mistaken in my
| assumption.
Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key signing" which
exists but designates a completely different thing that also exists in GPG?
Reply to: