[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: missing bug report email messages



On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:45:43PM -0500, sharkey@superk.physics.sunysb.edu wrote:
> I'm a relatively new Debian maintainer, and I've now had several bugs filed
> against some of my packages for which I never received email notification.
> I've also had bugs filed for which I have received notification.  I
> was just wondering if anyone else out there was having problems with bug
> notifications or if it's just me.

(You should have sent this to the BTS maintainers, owner@bugs.d.o, too)

> For example, my package cabextract 0.1-1 had one (big) bug for which three
> different people were kind enough to submit bug reports (82870,

At the time #82870 was received, the package had no maintainer in
Maintainers file (in /indices/ directory of our FTP site), because the bug
log says it was only forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, not you
too.

This happens when the package is new, or when there's an unrelated problem
with the Maintainers file...

> 82887,

Ditto.

> 83237)

This one was sent to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Eric Sharkey
<sharkey@debian.org>.

> as well as one unrelated bug (82794).

Like the first two...

> It seems to me that there's a time window between the upload of a new
> package and the BTS's awareness of who that package belongs to. If a user
> files a report during the first few days of the existence of a new
> package, the reports don't get sent.

Yes, but the time window should be no more than half an hour now.

There was a problem with that timing a couple of weeks ago -- we rsynced the
Maintainers file while dinstall was still running, so the copy was always 23
hours out of date. Maybe this was what happened to these bugs?

If you encounter a delay in BTS recognizing you as a maintainer of a package
longer than 24 hours, please inform owner@bugs.d.o and ftpmaster@d.o so that
we can look into what's happened to the Maintainers file.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification



Reply to: