Re: gpg/pgp confusion

To: Peter M Kahle <pkahle@pobox.com>
Cc: Rich Sahlender <rsahlen@debian.org>, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gpg/pgp confusion
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: 05 Feb 2000 18:21:14 +0000
Message-id: <87ya8zbjdx.fsf@nocrew.org>
In-reply-to: Peter M Kahle's message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:22:45 -0600"
References: <200002050348.WAA05037@born.rassys.com> <20000204230816.B6891@unity.ncsu.edu> <20000204222245.A31820@pops.dyndns.com>

Peter M Kahle <pkahle@pobox.com> writes:

> Ok, then I have a question. is the old key then removed from the
> keyring?

Not unless keyring-maint@debian.org is specifically asked to.

-- 
James

Reply to:

References:
- gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: Rich Sahlender <rsahlen@debian.org>
- Re: gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: Ben Darnell <bgdarnel@unity.ncsu.edu>
- Re: gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: Peter M Kahle <pkahle@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: automake/libtool questions
Next by Date: Re: Depend on emacsen, but also mailcrypt if emacs20
Previous by thread: Re: gpg/pgp confusion
Next by thread: automake/libtool questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread