Re: gpg/pgp confusion

To: Rich Sahlender <rsahlen@debian.org>, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gpg/pgp confusion
From: Peter M Kahle <pkahle@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:22:45 -0600
Message-id: <20000204222245.A31820@pops.dyndns.com>
Mail-followup-to: Rich Sahlender <rsahlen@debian.org>, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20000204230816.B6891@unity.ncsu.edu>; from bgdarnel@unity.ncsu.edu on Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 11:08:16PM -0500
References: <200002050348.WAA05037@born.rassys.com> <20000204230816.B6891@unity.ncsu.edu>

Ok, then I have a question. is the old key then removed from the keyring?
Just curious,
P
-- 
|| Peter M Kahle Jr              ||     PGP Public Key on Keyservers     ||
|| pkahle@pobox.com              ||    http://pops.dyndns.com/~pkahle/   || 
##===============================##======================================##

Attachment: pgpytaYdvEs5w.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>

References:
- gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: Rich Sahlender <rsahlen@debian.org>
- Re: gpg/pgp confusion
  - From: Ben Darnell <bgdarnel@unity.ncsu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Depend on emacsen, but also mailcrypt if emacs20
Next by Date: automake/libtool questions
Previous by thread: Re: gpg/pgp confusion
Next by thread: Re: gpg/pgp confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread