[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#67896: Support patch for dh_builddeps

On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of
> > my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following 
> > buildtime dependencies.
> Probably because it's a recent change.
> > Maybe this should be done so that they can be included (as required by
> > policy, or not?) into the control file by the maintainers.
> Just upload something and wait until the m68k autobuilder hits it..
I think Roman reports those things as bugs, so maybe you're just a good

See here for some of the source-dependencies the autobuilders use:

And maybe here for an older text I have written when Build-Depends came up
(this may be seriously out of date, I let the daemons do the bug reporting now)

I did not follow the discussion completely, but I think its rather
pointless, since its all already there in sbuild and the build-daemons.
If you look at some of the bugs Roman has reported for the m68k-buildd 
(Missing build dependencies) you should see this. I do not want to pick a
package from that list now, beside, uk.debian seems not to work ATM...


Reply to: