[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#67896: Support patch for dh_builddeps

Previously Christian Hammers wrote:
> Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of
> my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following 
> buildtime dependencies.

Probably because it's a recent change.

> Maybe this should be done so that they can be included (as required by
> policy, or not?) into the control file by the maintainers.

Just upload something and wait until the m68k autobuilder hits it..


 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpPJbdN2j41t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: