Hi Nilesh, Nilesh Patra, on 2021-01-30 20:44:38 +0530: > On Sat, 30 Jan, 2021, 8:14 pm Étienne Mollier, <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> > wrote: > > Étienne Mollier, on 2021-01-30 14:33:41 +0100: > > > * I curiously couldn't locate mipsel builds in my backups, but > > > from what I recall I got results very similar to mips64el. > > > > The build goes through on mipsel (but not mips64el)! I did not > > recall correctly it seems; it might be a clue about what could > > be wrong. > > > > That sounds unusual. It's usually the other way round - can it be a false > positive? > Should I try this on a mips64 porter box? Thank you for your offer of testing it on real hardware. :) I agree this is very unusual, but that is what I am witnessing with qemu-user-static at the time indeed. If you are curious and have the energy to investigate this, I suppose it would be at least worth an attempt on real hardware, sure! Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature